Talkin’ bout my-yyy piano

One of the most fabulous gifts my parents ever gave me was piano lessons. I started them in second grade. Once a week, after school, I’d walk across town from the Oxford elementary school, where my mom was a fourth grade teacher — across the bridge that spans the Chenango River — and make my way to my piano teacher’s house. Her last name was Scarlet and she was a Miss. Miss Scarlet. I didn’t know about the other Miss Scarlet yet. My Miss Scarlet lived with her sister, also elderly, also unmarried, in a house that was very still and full of lace and furniture that I didn’t dare touch, barely dared to look at, and her piano was weighted down by the white ceramic busts of composers that, to me, all looked alike, unconnected with anything except their own glossy anonymous whiteness.

Miss Scarlet was the organist of my church and had advocated that our school district teach Latin, so she would tell me what pieces she was going to play at next week’s service and was very pleased when I began taking Latin in high school.

I took piano lessons from her until probably about my junior year, and then I took lessons again in college when I found out I could take them as part of my courseload and actually earn credits for it.

Then, for many years I lived without a piano. Pianos are not suited for an itinerate lifestyle — for living quarters split among students, for moves that seem to come along every six months or so, moves you manage with your own car or maybe the help of a friend with a truck.

Now I have a home in the suburbs — a spot where I’ll be staying for awhile.

It wasn’t easy to pick out a piano, from among the used pianos at the store. I had no idea how to choose. I knew I needed something small, and inexpensive. But it had been so long, at that point, since I’d played (15 years?) that I felt funny even trying them.

But a black Wurlitzer console caught my eye. It was reasonably priced, and the right size.

I played a few keys. I liked its sound. It sounded, to me, like a bigger piano.

Nobody else likes it. The man who tunes it volunteered that he likes a piano with a softer tone. My mother’s console sounds downright muffled in comparison — she doesn’t much care for my piano’s sound, either.

But I love it.

I didn’t play much even after I got the piano, maybe six years ago — I was busy with a preschooler, it was hard to make the time. Then last year I started again a bit more seriously. It was a bit disheartening. I felt I’d lost whatever ease I once had. Then I contracted a frozen shoulder, left side, and between the pain and the loss of mobility I had to give it up.

At long last, now, I am back at it again. And for some reason I’m at a loss to explain, all the old stuff has suddenly come back. I’ll sit down to try a piece I haven’t touched since my early 20s and my hands remember it. They get ahead of me sometimes, I’ll realize I’m playing and with the realization I’ll suddenly lose my place and sit there laughing at myself.

And the piano’s sound: yes, it’s loud. It’s a ringing tone, it’s loud, it’s brash, brassy. But I love it. I love what I can do with the dynamic range. I love that I can ham it up. I was playing Gonoud’s Funeral March of a Marionette tonight, and it’s like I never connected with the piece before — I can remember that it used to bore me, I’d play it part way, then get bored. But not with this piano. This piano is somehow letting me find what this piece is about, the peculiar, precise hard drama of it.

I’m not a performer — I’ve never liked playing for people. But what I do love is to work up my own emotional response, and my little piano lets me do it.

Aaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh.

I love my piano.

(Btw, this is interesting: an abstract of a study that compares the auditory response to “pure tones” vs. piano tones. Piano tones elicit the stronger response . . .)

Corgis and children

Some years ago, a Corgi rescue organization asked permission to reprint a post I wrote for a Yahoo forum on their website.

They folded my post into an article they published for people who wonder if Corgis are a good breed for families with children.

Every once in awhile I get emails from people who have read the article. Unfortunately, most of them come from people who have realized, too late, that they have a heart-breaking problem on their hands.

I got one of those this weekend. Woman’s Corgi bit her three-year-old daughter on the face. The plastic surgeon is hopeful that the scars won’t be too bad.

These emails share something else in common: between the lines, what people want is for me to show them how to make it better.

Unfortunately, there is no way to make it better.

Once a dog has snapped at someone, let alone bitten, your options are very limited. If you’ve purchased the dog from a “reputable breeder,” you can probably ship the dog back. You’ll be out whatever you paid for the dog, but at least the problem is no longer yours.

If you got the dog from a “backyard breeder” (someone you found in the classifieds, for example) or a pet shop, or a neighbor whose dog had puppies, things are much more grim.

You can try to find a behaviorist who can help you learn to modify the behavior. Unfortunately, that’s no panacea. If you happen to choose a lousy behaviorist, you may end up with a dog that is more aggressive and less predictable than before.

Behaviorists cost money.

Behaviorists also don’t actually “fix” a dog. They help you learn how to modify a dog’s behavior. You are going to have to do a lot of work. It’s going to take time, consistency, and focus.

And no matter how much work you do, you can’t erase the fact that your dog has bitten. You can’t ever leave your dog unsupervised around children, for example.

So you’ll end up sinking money and time into a situation that, at best, is somewhat manageable.

Oh, and by the way, you may be in for another expensive surprise when it’s time for you to renew your homeowner’s insurance policy.

Hopefully you’ve got the cash on hand to self-insure.

Your only other option, sadly, is to have the dog put to sleep. Rescue organizations won’t take dogs that have bitten (they are glutted with dogs that haven’t bitten — and taking a dog that has bitten opens them to liabilities, should the dog bite again).

Unfortunately, people really really don’t want to hear this. When I wrote to the woman who last emailed me, I got an angry email back, accusing me of being cruel.

Cruel?

Give me a break. Cruel would have been to tell her she’s an idiot for not getting her dog neutered, for failing to train the dog properly in the first place, for allowing a dog that had begun to snap anywhere near her children.

Cruel would be asking her what kind of a mother would keep a dog in her home after it had bitten her daughter’s face.

Cruel, yeah, I could have been cruel. But I wasn’t.

Here’s how she closed her email to me:

I would hate to hear your response to someone you knew and really cared for.

Now, that is cruel.

I love this town

As I wrote in my last post, one thing Rochester has going for it is that it’s family-friendly.

Case in point. I was on one of the many public soccer fields in my town of Brighton this afternoon, kicking a ball around with my daughter. Up walks a teenager with her little sister. Asking if they could play. Next thing you know, we had a pick-up game of two-on-two soccer going.

It was fun, it was great practice for the kids. It reminded me so much of the pick-up basketball games I used to have when I was growing up that the mix of joy & nostalgia almost hurt.

I love this town.

This one’s about Rochester’s Renaissance Square

If there’s any local issue that I care enough about to blog regularly, Renaissance Square — estimated price tag, $230 million — is it. I simply don’t believe it’s a good use of taxpayer money. I don’t care how much is funded by the feds or the state. It’s too much money. It’s too much risk. It just can’t be a priority right now.

Now look at this: an article on the DLC website about the folly of municipal planning built on the single leg of attracting “creatives”:

The new mantra advocates an urban strategy that focuses on being “hip” and “cool” rather than straightforward and practical. It is eagerly promoted by the Brookings Institution, by some urban development types, and by city pols from both parties in places like Cincinnati, Denver, Tampa, and San Diego. It seeks to displace the Progressive Policy Institute’s New Economy Indexes with what might be called a “Latte Index” — the density of Starbucks — as a measure of urban success. Cities that will win the new competition, it’s asserted, will be those that pour their resources into the arts and other cultural institutions that attract young, “with-it” people who constitute, for them, the contemporary version of the anointed. Call them latte cities.

This is exactly the thinking behind Renaissance Square. Build a performing arts center, and Rochester will become hip. Young people will want to live here. Downtown will be revitalized.

That’s B.S. We would be fools to fall for it.

Here, from the article, is a round-up of the metro areas — all of which have considerably more resources at their disposal than Rochester — who have pursued this municipal strategy:

San Francisco, according to economist David Friedman, has actually lost employment at a rate comparable to that of the Great Depression. Roughly 4 percent of the population has simply left town, often to go to more affordable, if boring, places, such as Sacramento. San Francisco is increasingly a city without a real private-sector economy. It’s home to those on the government or nonprofit payroll and the idle rich — “a cross between Carmel and Calcutta,” in the painful phrase of California state librarian Kevin Starr, a San Francisco native.

. . . Seattle has also lost jobs at a far faster rate than the rest of the country and has its own litany of social problems, including a sizable homeless population; the loss of its signature corporation, Boeing; and growing racial tensions.

Although Portland is often hailed as a new urban paradise, it is in a region suffering very high unemployment. “They made a cool place, but the economy sucks,” notes Parks, who conducted a major study for the Oregon city. “They forgot all the things that matter, like economic diversification and affordability.”

New York City has also suffered heavy job losses. Gotham’s population outflows, which slowed in the late 1990s, have accelerated, including in Manhattan, the city’s cool core. In contrast, New York’s relatively unhip suburbs, particularly those in New Jersey, quietly weathered the Bush recession in fairly fine fettle.

So where are people going — and why?

Today, economic growth is shifting to less fashionable but more livable locales such as San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, Calif.; Rockland County, N.Y.; Des Moines, Iowa; Bismarck, N.D.; and Sioux Falls, S.D.

In many cases, this shift also encompasses technology-oriented and professional service firms, whose ranks ostensibly dominate the so-called “creative class.” This trend actually predates the 2000 crash, but it has since accelerated. Since the 1990s, the growth in financial and other business services has taken place not in New York, San Francisco, or Seattle, but in lower-cost places like Phoenix; Charlotte, N.C.; Minneapolis; and Des Moines.

Perhaps more important, the outflow from decidedly un-hip places like the Midwest has slowed, and even reversed. Employers report that workers are seeking more affordable housing, and, in many cases, less family-hostile environments.

To be sure, such cities are not without their share of Starbucks outlets, and they have put great stress on quality-of-life issues — like recreation and green space — that appeal to families and relocating firms. But the watchword is livability, not coolness.

Affordable housing. Family-friendly communities. “Livability.”

Sounds dull as dirt, doesn’t it? But it’s the foundation our community needs if we’re going to reverse the exodus of young people.

The politicians who back Renaissance Square will gladly drive Rochester off a cliff, if they can look all flashy while they steer. We have to stop them.

Plot, plot everywhere . . .

Literary agent Kristin Nelson has an interesting post up today about the difference between “dramatic plot elements” and conflict. She writes:

I just want to clarify here that these two things are not the same.

Conflict is what motivates and drives your character (and can be internal and well as external).

Dramatic plot elements are simply events that occur in the story.

Not the same thing. So what I’m seeing is that writers are confusing the two and making the assumption that if they have a lot of big events in their novels, that’s enough “conflict”  to carry the story.

I’m going to ask, in her comments, if she’ll follow this up by elaborating on conflict . . . when she critiqued pitches on TWLAuthorTalks last week, she mentioned lack of conflict as a major strike against a couple of pitches. It would be interesting to get more insight from her into how successful writers build conflict into their novels.

More migraine options

Glenn Reynolds insta-blogged yesterday about this gadget, that uses a magnetic pulse to stave off a budding migraine.

There’s also this, which I found out about through my friend Dave Harney, who publishes Rochester Healthy Living: an FDA-approved device you wear on your front teeth at night to reduce jaw clenching. The company claims in trials, 82 percent of the device users had a 77% average reduction in “migraine events.”

Here’s the manufacturer’s website.

Here are some interesting facts about the link between headache and jaw clenching (one caveat: these aren’t sourced . . .):

* [The j]aw clenching muscles of migraine sufferers are 70% larger in volume and generate significantly higher bite forces that control subjects . . .

*Tension-type headache patients contract their temporalis muscles (clench their jaw) during sleep, on average, 14 times more intensely that asymptomatic controls.

*Simple minimal voluntary jaw-clenching (of less than 30% of maximum effort) for 30 minutes (with two rest periods) still results in a headache for 63% of migraine sufferers. Jaw clenching during sleep can frequently exceed voluntary maximum.

I haven’t tried the device, but I plan to. Ever since I learned about it I’ve made a conscious effort to relax my jaw and that seems to be helping me avoid full-blown migraines. I really think there’s something to this one.

Blue Meanies Attack in Massachusetts

Okay, this might seem contradictory, since I’ve blogged about how horrified I am that parents don’t feed their kids more nutritious food.

But banning fluffernutter sandwiches????

First of all, the “nutter” part of the sandwich is peanut butter, which is a source of protein, B vitamins, calcium, and Vitamin E. Granted, the fluff is empty calories, but how is it any worse than jelly?

Put the thing on whole wheat bread, sure. But ban it?

How is a fluffernutter sandwich any worse than the other crap they hand out from school cafeterias? Mac and cheese (white macaroni glopped with processed cheese food stuff)? Chicken finger (breaded deep fried chicken scraps)? “Pizza pockets” ( more white bread with a bit of ketchup and five molecules of cheese inside)?

I swear, they must hand out stupid pills to legislators right after election night.

This is also a terrific example of why you can’t rely on government to sort out issues that require focused, case-by-case, parental decisions. Sometimes you have to sugar things a bit to get kids to eat them. I dress up cooked carrots with sugar sometimes, to get my daughter to eat them. I use sweetened salad dressings to make green salads appeal to her.

I also favor keeping soda vending machines out of schools (especially at the grade school level). There’s no redeeming value to soda, except as an occasional treat.

But banning fluffernutter — that’s just silly. Do-good idiocy run amuck.

The world’s deepest hole

Man. Oh man. Seven miles.

The Russians did it–it took them twenty four years. They were stopped by the heat.

Despite the scientists’ efforts to combat the heat by refrigerating the drilling mud before pumping it down, at twelve kilometers the drill began to approach its maximum heat tolerance. At that depth researchers had estimated that they would encounter rocks at 100°C (212°F), but the actual temperature was about 180°C (356°F)– much higher than anticipated. At that level of heat and pressure, the rocks began to act more like a plastic than a solid, and the hole had a tendency to flow closed whenever the drill bit was pulled out for replacement. Forward progress became impossible . . .

A bunch of old theories about the Earth’s crust were disproven by that drill. I can remember being taught some of them in school — like that the crust is granite over a layer of basalt. Nope. ‘Tisn’t either.

The article’s by Alan Bellows.

This is my lawn

In the back yard.

long long grass

Notice the length of the grass. And that it’s going to seed. I’m neglecting everything. Except my job, my kid, and my novel.

I’ll pick up the blogging pace again soon, but priorities is priorities ;-)

Birdie birdie in the . . . plumbing aisle

You’ve probably noticed them: birds flying around in malls, or airports, or “big box” stores, like Home Depot or Walmart.

Here’s an interesting article about this phenomenon in the Baltimore Sun (registration required).

Turns out these stores are idea habitat. No predators. Plenty of niches for nesting. Spilt grass or bird seed makes for easy forage, and for water there’s always a puddle around (or, I suppose, a working model of one of the ubiquitous fountains these stores sell for peoples’ gardens).

The stores’ doors don’t post a problem — the birds just figure out how to get through when we humans open them: they “hover near store entrances waiting for shoppers to trip the [motion detection] sensors.”

Most of the birds I’ve seen are English sparrows, but other birds that commonly make their homes in these stores are starlings, pigeons, house finches and mourning doves. And then there are the unusual ones. The article mentions occasional sightings of crows and owls, and a red-tailed hawk that “took up residence inside a North Carolina Home Depot store” and became a regional phenom — people would come to the store just to see it.

Not everyone is thrilled about them. Food stores can’t tolerate them (the droppings pose a potential health hazard) and some people just aren’t . . . nature types.

Phil Miller of Perry Hall is a sales representative for a company that makes lighting products carried by Home Depot. His job takes him to hundreds of locations.

“It’s a pain in the neck,” he says of store birds, which leave droppings on high-stacked inventory boxes that he has to move around. Miller was recently in a Delaware Home Depot that had caught the fancy of a mockingbird, a breed notorious for its mimicking ability.

“That thing was going for hours and hours,” he says. “You couldn’t even hear the radio. It made every sound possible.”

Sorry, but my sympathy is with the bird ;-)