When characters meet “The End”

Here’s a piece by Charles McGrath in the NewYork Times about authors who have killed off their most famous characters. I won’t list them since it’s a bigger treat to read the piece ;-)

For a hook, he reports that J.K. Rowling has hinted Harry Potter may be headed for an untimely demise . . . well, untimely in the eyes of readers, because think about it, when you become engrossed in a book you step into a fictional time, and that fictional time swells into its own infinite bubble with no relation whatsoever to the relentless line we normally walk — so from our perspective, it’s always too soon for a Harry Potter to go, isn’t it . . .

To blog or not to blog . . .

If you’re a writer-o’-books, the answer to this question is “depends on who you ask.”

Miss Snark has recommended that novelists be cautious about blogging — because when you’re blogging, you’re not working on your novel. But she also wrote, once, that a “well-clicked” blog can be a plus when you’re querying agents.

Late last month, John at Romantic Ramblings recounted the advice he got from his last agent, who told him a blog was practically indispensable.

But John also found a warning on Agent Query that a blog may be a liability rather than an asset for writers looking for representation. (What they are really trying to say, I think, is that a poorly written or presented blog can be a liability. Which is true, I’m sure.)

So now, to add another twist to the conversation, comes this: Joe Garofoli, in the San Francisco Chronicle, reports on how political blogger Glenn Greenwald was able to coordinate online publicity for his non-fic book among his like-minded blogging buddies. The resulting burst of orders pushed his book to number 1 on Amazon.

Granted, Amazon is only one reseller, so if your book is ranked high there, but isn’t selling anywhere else, it doesn’t really mean much.

Except that you get to say your book is a number 1 Amazon best-seller. Certainly better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick.

So what’s the verdict? I’d say it’s something like this. Don’t blog if you tend to use it as an excuse to avoid doing the real work of writing. Don’t put up a sloppy blog, or a cheesy blog. Don’t present a virtual persona that comes across as loony or raises red flags about your people skills. (Of course, if you have people-skills problems you probably don’t know your blog comes across that way but that’s a whole ‘nother topic.)

And last but not least, remember that blogging is really a type of networking. If it’s going to help you sell books, it’s because of the relationships you’ve built, not because you’ve mentioned your title and now it shows up on Google.

I read po-tah-to . . .

A couple of British researchers surveyed men and women about their reading habits and oh no! We read different things!

lol

The LA Times has bulleted some of the results (registration required). Here’s a couple:

* No male authors made the women’s top five, and no female authors made the men’s top five.

* Only four books made both top 20 lists.

You know what’s funny? Back (waaaay back) when I was an undergraduate and indulged in the conceit that being a writer meant being a literary writer, I assumed my audience would be male as well as female.

Now, I could care less about writing for men. No offense, men, I think you’re adorable but it’s complicated to communicate with you.

My dog training book probably appeals well to women, and my novels-in-progress are romances, so they skew to gal readers. Fortunately that means my writing is targeted at the largest market segment, in both cases.

But I’m thinking, it may be a bit trickier to do a commercially viable books if you’re a man . . . hmmmm. Unless of course you channel a Navaho & send your MS to Esquire. lol

I’ve entered!

I sent a submission to Evil Editor’s “invent a synopsis” contest.

I chose Group 3: Little Girl Blue; The Midnight Diaries; The Monster Within; Portal to Murder; Raise the Buried Dead.

I’ll let you know if any of mine get picked.

In related news, it’s possible I’ve developed a low-grade e-crush on Evil Editor. Fortunately it will never get out of hand, thanks to the appalling cartoon he uses to represent his personage next to his posts. But omg his posts crack me up!

UPDATE: oooh, it’s not an invent-a-synopsis contest — it’s a pick the real synopsis from the fake synopses contest. LOL

UPDATE #2: My Contest Picks

Esquire circles back

Andrew Chaikivsky has written a piece for Esquire on Tim Barrus, aka “Nasdijj.”

Equire published a 3000-word article purported to be written by a Navaho in 1999. The article launched a minor literary career — until LA Weekly revealed the author’s true identity last January.

I’m not sure the new Esquire piece really answers the question “why” but it certainly adds some more color to the tale.

I blogged about Barrus previously here.

Why you shouldn’t pay $500 for a copy

People are putting copies of “Opal” on ebay, hoping to cash in on the Kaavya Viswanathan plagiarism scandal. Today on Amazon, copies are still being offered for $80-120. But on ebay, bidding has cooled off. Prices were up in the $50 range yesterday. Not today.

This may be why: according to The Book Standard, about 12,000 copies were sold before Little, Brown pulled the book.

That’s a lot of copies. I’m no expert, but I can’t see the value going much higher than $50. Not for the foreseeable future. So if you own a copy and want to double your money, go for it. But if you’re thinking you’ll buy a copy at that price and flip it . . . maybe not such a good idea.

(For background see posts I’ve written here and here. And here and here and here.)

Inside Alloy

The New York Observer has a piece up about Alloy Entertainment, the book packager that was called in to help Kaavya Viswanathan “write” How Opal. . . :

The convoluted authorial structure of Alloy books is anything but transparent.

“To me, all that stuff is such a black box,” said one author who has worked with the company. “They have writers who don’t exist, and they have writers who don’t really write the stuff, and they have one series supposedly by one author that are by many. There’s no one-to-one alignment between anything that gets produced and the producer. There’s no literary accountability.” 

Literary accountability, maybe not. We’ll see about legal accountability. As Booksquare writes in their post about Little, Brown’s decision not to revise Opal:

While we’re not cynical, we fully expect a lawsuit or two to be coming down the pike. ‘Cause this is America and suing is our national right.

(See other posts I’ve written here and here. And here and here.)

“I burst into tears”

That was Kaavya Viswanathan’s reaction when she first saw her book in print, according to this article in The Guardian. Here’s the full quote.

In an interview with The Associated Press before the controversy, Viswanathan talked about the pressures of her new fame and described the first time she saw her novel in print. One Saturday in March in the Harvard bookstore, she happened upon a prominent display of her books, each slapped with a head shot that took up most of the back cover.

“I started to hyperventilate, and I burst into tears,” Viswanathan said at the time.

In retrospect, looks like that was a tell.

(Other posts about all this here and here. And here.)

The scandal that keeps on scandaling

I guess if you’re going to plagiarize, you might as well plagiarize from more than one book.

The Harvard Crimson is now reporting it’s found passages from Kaavya Viswanathan’s novel “How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild, and Got a Life” that were lifted from Meg Cabot’s “The Princess Diaries” and Salman Rushdi’s “Haroun and the Sea of Stories“(!!!).

And The New York Times (registration required) has published a piece reporting similarities between passages in Viswanathan’s book and passages in “Can You Keep a Secret?” by Sophie Kinsella.

This wasn’t a novel. It was a fricking medley.

(I previously blogged about this here.)