More (scarab) bracelets

mid century scarab bracelet
One of the lovely scarab bracelet pictures sent in by site visitors :)

One of my absolutely favorite sites on the interwebs is etymonline.com :)

I got hooked when I went on a James Hillman kick about a year ago. Which started when I began another dream project.

I have ridiculously good dream recall. I suppose I was born with it (although I also think it’s related to being a writer — I even published a little ebook titled Writing, Dreams, and Consciousness on the topic).

Good dream recall is one of those blessing/curse things. If I commit to recording dreams every morning, it literally consumes several hours of my time — because when you remember 3-4 dreams in great detail you can easily end up with 5000+ words’ worth of writing. Needless to say this eats into my work time. It also leaves me with a perplexing mess, because although many times I “get” at least some aspect of some of my dreams, very often their message eludes me. I am convinced (call me nuts) that every single element of any dream is there for a purpose. But oh, man. Figuring out what that purpose is?

Despite these issues, several times in my life I’ve decided to suck it up, Buttercup, and record dreams. Every morning, no exceptions. And so that’s what I did, for about six straight months last year. Write ’em down, then try to interpret. And I found Hillman, and fell hard because he is (was) a Jungian with a lovely touch when it comes to dream interpretation.

My absolutely favorite Hillman book is his Animal Presences, which deals with animals in dreams.

And yes, this post is actually about scarab bracelets.

I started collecting them after I dreamed I had purchased one.

Not that I recommend acting out your dreams in 3D reality, despite the fact that the Native American peoples, the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois), did exactly that; I’m sure they were on to something, but someday I’ll tell the story of what happened to me, one time — I was young and stupid, realized I was re-living a dream scenario and grabbed it, a bit too literally, by the pointy end of the stick. I rather made a fool of myself. Ouch. Also, this will be a story that is released only after I’m dead hahahahaha — yes I’m still embarrassed by it!

Back to Hillman: one of the cool things he does to enrich dream interpretation is consider the etymology of the words we use as we articulate / label a dream’s visuals. Sometimes looking at dreams this way can lead to apparent dead ends, in my experience, but other times it can be quite revealing — dreams often use “word play” — if you dream about a bee, it might “be” about “being,” for example. And if you push at dreams this way, you can sometimes start to feel them as a kind of language. “The symbol communes,” writes Jeffrey Kripal in The Flip. You start to feel dreams as a language the way you start to think in a foreign language once you’ve truly begun to learn it.

So that’s how I came to etymonline.com and became a regular visitor, not only when I noodle dreams but when I write, and want to dig precisely into the nuances of a particular word.

Link, linking, linked

This morning I looked up bracelet. Not hugely interesting, to be honest:

“ornamental ring or clasped chain for the wrist,” mid-15c., from Old French bracelet (14c.), diminutive of bracel, from Latin bracchiale “armlet,” from bracchium “an arm, a forearm,” from Greek brakhion “an arm” (see brachio-).

But our scarab bracelets aren’t armlets. They’re link bracelets — and things do warm up if you move to the idea of links and linking.

There is no Old English work for “link.” The word appears to be Scandanavian originally. However, there are a couple of German relatives: “Gelenk”, which means “articulation, a joint of the body; a link, ring,” and the Proto-Germanic word “khlink,” which is the source of the German word “lenken:” “to bend, turn, lead.”

I love this, because it reminds us that links are connectors but also relate to flexibility (bending) and process (leading).

So how about this — call it a thought of the day: we sometimes seem to horribly separated from everything — from each other, from Spirit, from understanding — but perhaps we are more linked than we realize. Perhaps what we perceive as separation is actually a bending. The link is there, we’re just not able to “see around the corner” to understand where, exactly, we’re being led. We just need to trust it.

In any case, my posts about scarab bracelets are linking me to people I’d otherwise never meet.

Coincidence? Or spooky symbols at a distance?

:)

And some of you are sending me emails and sharing your experiences with these funny little bracelets. And also pictures, which is a delight, and which I get to share, now — another delight :)

So on to the bracelets …

This is the underside of the bracelet pictured above :)

Starting with this picture of the back of the bracelet I shared at the top of this post. The bracelet’s owner also made a sketch of the markings on the back of one of the scarabs. Although the two leftmost markings are familiar, the other three are completely new to (see here for sketches I made of the markings on my bracelets).

Another reader sent me some pics of an interesting variation of the scarab bracelet style.

Scarab bracelet
Love this variation — I bet it looks beautiful on it’s owner’s wrist!

The cabochons on this bracelet are set on a diagonal … I’ve never seen a bracelet with this design. And I must say, if I were to come across a bracelet styled like this on ebay or etsy, I’d be very tempted to buy it — just because it is so unusual :)

mid century scarab bracelet
Although the bracelets’ stones vary in size and shape, many of the same markings crop up over and over.

She also sent me a pic of that bracelet flipped over — and here we go, those familiar “hieroglyphs” — basically identical to the marks carved on several of my bracelets.

Which once again suggests that these stones were all being sourced from a small number of producers …

The stones on this bracelet look molded rather than carved.

That said, there are bracelets out there with stones that are made of glass or other materials. Another set of pictures one of my readers sent is a bracelet with stones that appear to have been molded rather than carved.

Here’s a close-up of one of the cabochons.

The setting is really pretty though, isn’t it? And the designer made sure that you could see the “hieroglyphs” :)

Top view of the bracelet with the glass scarabs.

Here’s a top view of that same bracelet. It reminds me in design of the one I own with the small stones, which I love to wear when I’m looking for something a little lighter and more delicate.

So that’s it for now but please, if you own one of these, I’d love to see and share more photos!

Thanks for reading :)

Once Upon a Flarey Tale by Kirsten Mortensen
Her new apartment is a Tower. Will her Prince be far behind?

P.S. for convenience: if you haven’t seen them yet, my first post about these bracelets is here, and I posted about the “hieroglyphics” here.

Pssst! Do you read romance novels?

Subscribe to my e-newsletter and I’ll send you a free e-copy of my upcoming novel, Once Upon a Flarey Tale!

Scarab bracelet mystery … the “hieroglyphs”

What are the markings on the backs of scarab bracelet stones? Hieroglyphs? Kanji? Or nonesense?

Drawings of the markings on the backs of my scarab bracelet cabochons. They’re supposed to be hieroglyphs, but I’m not so sure …

One of the things I mentioned in my first post about scarab bracelets is that on many of the bracelets in my collection — which are typical examples of 20th century pop culture bracelets — the underside of the cabochons are marked. What I’d heard (chatting to antique store proprietors mostly, but you also see it online) is that the marks are “hieroglyphs.”

The stones are intended to function as charms; the inscriptions confer luck or blessings on the wearer.

Cotinis mutabilis figeater beetle

There are 30,000 species of Scarab beetles worldwide. I came across these (deceased… RIP pretty green beetles!) Fig Eater beetles a few weeks ago on the sidewalk by my house.

There’s some merit to the idea. The scarab itself is symbolic of pretty powerful stuff, although it’s not quite as straightforward as “it’s the good luck beetle.” Per this paper published by UCLA,

The scarab was used by the ancient Egyptians as a symbol of the rising sun being pushed across the sky (just as the beetle pushes balls of dung across the sand), exemplifying the notion that the sun god can create his own means of rebirth.

Bit of a leap from a symbol of the god Khepri/divine self-regeneration to “hope you win the lotto/get laid/avoid catching the flu this winter.” But the general idea is there: Wear scarab! Can’t hurt. Might help?

So what about the inscriptions?

“Genuine” scarab amulets — meaning museum quality / ancient Egyptian — had inscriptions carved on the back. There are some images in that UCLA paper of some of them, with translations. One inscription commemorates the building of a lake. Others are names. Here’s an edited version of a translation of an inscription that conferred a blessing; the inscription is the

… throne name of Thutmose III … [and] “the good god Menkheperra,” and below this an anx sign, meaning “may he live.” Menkheperra can also be read cryptographically as the name Amen-ra (sun disk).

“May he live” is a solid blessing to carry in your pocket for sure.

Scarab bracelets

Three of my scarab bracelets.

But fast forward to bracelets like the ones I own.

These aren’t ancient Egyptian amulets. They were made and sold in the 20th Century by costume jewelry makers.

People that bought them probably assumed that the markings on the back were hieroglyphs. But are they, really?

I did a bit of poking around the interwebs.

Logical first step: do an image search on Egyptian hieroglyphics to see if any of the symbols on the backs of my stones are obvious matches.

One of the things that seems pretty obvious, to my eye anyway, is that hieroglyphs are a completely different type of mark. They’re more pictorial, generally.

For example, here’s hieroglyphs from this online image next to my drawings of the marks on my bracelets. They really don’t look anything alike.

real Egyptian hieroglyphs don't look anything like the marks on the backs of my braceletsI combed through pages of Egyptian hieroglyphs. I didn’t find a single one that resembled the marks on my bracelets.

You’d expect, if the bracelet manufacturers were really trying, that they’d at least put an ankh on a couple of the stones, or an Eye of Horus. But nope.

Here’s another example, this one of cursive hieroglyphics from The Papyrus of Ani:

Cursive hieroglyphics from the Papyrus of Ani compared to marks on my scarab braceletsArguably a little bit closer — but still a huge stretch to imagine any of the marks on any of my bracelets is a 1:1 for a mark on that piece of scroll.

In fact, to my eye, the marks on my bracelets look more like kanji (Chinese characters) than Egyptian hieroglyphs. Japanese kanji are the closest to my eye. Here’s an image of Japanese kanji that I found on this site. There’s a pretty strong resemblance between these words and the marks on my bracelets — or anyway, stronger resemblance than to hieroglyphs …

Kanji image from https://awordfromjapan.wordpress.com/2016/03/14/why-learn-bushu-building-blocks-of-kanji/Which led me to Hypothesis #2:

Maybe the stones were sourced from Asia, and maybe the people that carved them inscribed messages in Chinese or Japanese!

Oooh!!!!

Well. As it turns out, there are tools galore online that let you draw kanji and then display the English translation.

Here’s one.

Tell you what, go play, if you have a scarab bracelet and think maybe the marks are kanji. But for my part, by the time I was done messing around on those tools for an hour or so, I started to feel a little foolish.

I wondered if I should even blog about this. I wondered if people who read and write Japanese wouldn’t find it laughable.

“Really? You thought the marks on my bracelets might be real words???”

So let me go out on a limb, here, with Hypothesis #3:

The marks on the backs of these bracelets are nonsense symbols.

They are random marks carved by stone workers who mass produced cabochons for US costume jewelry makers. They made simple marks, because simple marks are easy, and these were being mass produced after all.

The same marks show up on jewelry from different makers because makers often sourced their stones from common suppliers.

If you see any holes in my logic — or know of any evidence that either supports or refutes my latest/greatest hypothesis — drop me a line or leave a note in the comments.

Thanks for reading!

(And if you haven’t read my other posts on scarab bracelets, here is my first post, and here is my second.

Pssst. Are you a reader?

Once Upon a Flarey Tale by Kirsten Mortensen

Meet Marion Flarey.

She’s out of a job.

Buried in school loan debt. About to be homeless.

And she’s no Rapunzel.

She doesn’t even have long hair.

But she just found an apartment.

And it has a Tower…

Once Upon a Flarey Tale.

Available on Amazon for Kindle or print, or click here to select from other e-formats.

Book 1 of my Marion Flarey Series.

Winner, 2020 Incipere Award for Women’s Fiction, Clean.