Of the 20-odd agents I’ve queried so far for my current novel, I’ve done only one by mail.<\/p>\n
All the rest have been email queries.<\/p>\n
I have to believe I’m not the only writer who’s inclined to favor e-querying. It’s cheaper and less trouble than printing and packaging a snail mail query. And you also get answers faster. Granted, most of them will be “no thanks” kind of answers but even they feel good in a weird kind of way. At least you have evidence that things are moving.<\/p>\n
But here’s the thing. Many agents — many very good agents — still prefer traditional paper queries.<\/p>\n
So I hereby predict that writers who take the time to craft and mail traditional queries will, at some point, have a slight advantage in the agent-hunting game. Because at some point the majority of the great unpubbed will be dashing off e-queries. Which means anyone willing to put in a bit of extra effort and expense will be rewarded with a slightly less-crowded playing field.<\/p>\n
I predict you’ll soon be reading writer-advice articles that recommend you seek agents who only accept snail mail queries as a way of boosting your agent-hunting odds.<\/p>\n
You read it here, first.<\/p>\n
:-)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Of the 20-odd agents I’ve queried so far for my current novel, I’ve done only one by mail. All the rest have been email queries. I have to believe I’m not the only writer who’s inclined to favor e-querying. It’s … Continue reading