Megan McArdle has a column up about the meltdown at The New Republic.<\/p>\n
It’s an interesting read in general for anyone in the writing or publishing business. <\/a><\/p>\n But in particular, I chuckled to myself when she began describing some of the reasons running media companies presents special challenges. “You’re not running a normal type of organization,” she writes. “You’re running a professional group.”<\/p>\n And so you encounter a number of problems:<\/p>\n … the difficulty of getting creative types to produce great stuff on demand; the astonishing amount of autonomy that journalists need, because it’s impossible to write hard guidelines, and too expensive to supervise long hours of reporting and typing; the fact that great writers are frequently terrible managers and editors, which screws up the normal management pyramid; the simultaneous need for speed and accuracy; the fact that\u00a0media employment selects for a cluster of personality traits that resists closer management; the professional ethic that will stymie you when you decide to make a different set of trade-offs between competing priorities such as speed, accuracy, and the need to monetize your content; the\u00a0fact that writers, especially in the digital age, frequently take their audience with them if they leave, making it even harder to impose discipline …<\/p><\/blockquote>\n As someone who has earned a living as a professional writer for many, many years: yep. That pretty much sums us up :)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Megan McArdle has a column up about the meltdown at The New Republic. It’s an interesting read in general for anyone in the writing or publishing business. But in particular, I chuckled to myself when she began describing some of … Continue reading