Of the 20-odd agents I’ve queried so far for my current novel, I’ve done only one by mail.
All the rest have been email queries.
I have to believe I’m not the only writer who’s inclined to favor e-querying. It’s cheaper and less trouble than printing and packaging a snail mail query. And you also get answers faster. Granted, most of them will be “no thanks” kind of answers but even they feel good in a weird kind of way. At least you have evidence that things are moving.
But here’s the thing. Many agents — many very good agents — still prefer traditional paper queries.
So I hereby predict that writers who take the time to craft and mail traditional queries will, at some point, have a slight advantage in the agent-hunting game. Because at some point the majority of the great unpubbed will be dashing off e-queries. Which means anyone willing to put in a bit of extra effort and expense will be rewarded with a slightly less-crowded playing field.
I predict you’ll soon be reading writer-advice articles that recommend you seek agents who only accept snail mail queries as a way of boosting your agent-hunting odds.
You read it here, first.
:-)
I think you’re right, in the not-too-far-distant future. For now, I’m trying to do my homework and give each agent/agency what they say they want. But good point.
John
I think your prediction is right too. Lots of people submit without preparing properly and e-queries help them in their rush. So those who send a snail-mail query will usually take more time, if for no other reason, than the cost.
John, that is exactly right, of course — we need to do our homework — but plenty of people don’t :-)
And Amra, welcome to my blog and thanks for commenting!