Bah to book overhype

I recently picked up a paperback because its cover sported a glowing blurb by an author whose work I enjoy.

The book was a resounding disappointment, and, no dummy, I, I made a mental note to never trust a blurb in quite the same way again.

I’m comforted to learn that I am not alone. Heck no, I’m part of a trend, according to Damian Horner on Bookseller.com, who says that readers have become cynical about the rave reviews and gushing quotes that accompany so many book launches today.

I suspect we will soon see publishers working much more closely with bloggers and reading groups. They will run ongoing focus group panels and maybe some will even follow the Miramax model and ruthlessly target awards and prizes.

They already are. In an interview with conservative blogger/radio pundit Hugh Hewitt, for instance, Robert Ferrigno talks about how the publisher of his new political thriller, Prayers for the Assassin, spent “six figures” on website and blog marketing. (The website lets fans enter, virtually, the futuristic world of the novel.) Ferrigno predicts that in five years, “publishers will not be advertising in print media, except in very rare cases.”

These tactics work by generating word-of-mouth, which has credibility because the Mouth generating the Word tends to be a peer–a reader, just like you are, who has no vested interest in praising something that’s no good.

The weakness of this tactic, however, is that an amateur’s recommendations can be worthless, as well. Fifteen minutes scanning the reviews on Amazon is all you need to convince yourself of that ;-)

2 thoughts on “Bah to book overhype

  1. Ah! Subjectivity again! My book-of-the-year is your piece of schlock, and vice-versa. So, who can you trust? Even someone with similar tastes may like something you hate.

    Diversity – I guess it makes the world go ’round. My lament is that the folks who have cried over (literally) and raved about my book aren’t the folks who have a part in getting it published so the world can take a look.

    Same ol’ lament.

    John

  2. Hi, John. Well, objectivity & subjectivity is a whole ‘nother subject :-) While there is some variation as to taste, people really can come to a general consensus when something is good (or rotten). This particular book I mention is, I believe, exhibit A supporting Kristin Nelson’s observation that chick lit sales are falling off — it was probably sold 18-24 months ago when the industry was slathering for books like it; I bet today it wouldn’t have a chance. Will be interesting to see if this author ever has another book published.

    When it comes to getting a novel published, otoh, you’re not looking for a consensus, you’re looking for that pairs of needles-in-the-haystack — the agent and the editor who are going to go mad for it . . .

Comments are closed.