<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This one&#8217;s about Rochester&#8217;s Renaissance Square</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kirstenmortensen.com/this-ones-about-rochesters-renaissance-square.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/this-ones-about-rochesters-renaissance-square.htm</link>
	<description>smart &#38; funny romantic comedies!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KirstenMortensen.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another helping of crow a la Rochester</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/this-ones-about-rochesters-renaissance-square.htm/comment-page-1#comment-26453</link>
		<dc:creator>KirstenMortensen.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another helping of crow a la Rochester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=519#comment-26453</guid>
		<description>[...] (I&#8217;m not just being a crank, here, either. Yes, I believe it&#8217;s foolish for the city to own hard assets that it has to maintain, at taxpayer expense, for extended periods of time &#8212; particularly when local economic conditions suggest the risk of a return are not all that great. But I have constructive suggestions, too. I think the city should focus on making our community more livable and affordable for families, as per this post, and perhaps fund events to attract tourists, because that&#8217;s been demonstrated as a less risky way to stimulate economic development.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (I&#8217;m not just being a crank, here, either. Yes, I believe it&#8217;s foolish for the city to own hard assets that it has to maintain, at taxpayer expense, for extended periods of time &#8212; particularly when local economic conditions suggest the risk of a return are not all that great. But I have constructive suggestions, too. I think the city should focus on making our community more livable and affordable for families, as per this post, and perhaps fund events to attract tourists, because that&#8217;s been demonstrated as a less risky way to stimulate economic development.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KirstenMortensen.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;A certain level of subsidy&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/this-ones-about-rochesters-renaissance-square.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5354</link>
		<dc:creator>KirstenMortensen.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;A certain level of subsidy&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=519#comment-5354</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve blogged about this topic here, and here, and here. Not just grousing, either, I&#8217;m honestly trying to figure out what would work for this city. See also this post &amp; comment thread on the subject at 2Blowhards for a breath of intelligent perspective on our little project. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve blogged about this topic here, and here, and here. Not just grousing, either, I&#8217;m honestly trying to figure out what would work for this city. See also this post &#38; comment thread on the subject at 2Blowhards for a breath of intelligent perspective on our little project. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

