<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>kirsten mortensen &#187; mad cow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kirstenmortensen.com/tag/mad-cow/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php</link>
	<description>smart &#38; funny romantic comedies!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:35:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>They say &#8220;NO&#8221; to testing meat for mad cow</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/they-say-no-to-testing-meat-for-mad-cow.htm</link>
		<comments>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/they-say-no-to-testing-meat-for-mad-cow.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kirsten</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad cow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who would DO such a thing? Why, our very own United States Department of Agriculture, that&#8217;s who! The Agriculture Department is within bounds to bar meatpackers from testing slaughter cattle for mad cow disease, a U.S. Court of Appeals panel &#8230; <a href="http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/they-say-no-to-testing-meat-for-mad-cow.htm">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who would DO such a thing?</p>
<p>Why, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN2928450820080829">our very own United States Department of Agriculture, that&#8217;s who</a>!</p>
<blockquote><p>
The Agriculture Department is within bounds to bar meatpackers from testing slaughter cattle for mad cow disease, a U.S. Court of Appeals panel said in a 2-1 ruling on Friday.</p>
<p>Creekstone Farms Premium Beef LLC, a small Arkansas packer, filed suit on March 23, 2006, to gain access to mad-cow test kits. It said it wanted to test every animal at its plant to assure foreign buyers that the meat was safe to eat . . .</p>
<p>In a 25-page ruling, Appellate Judges Karen Henderson and Judith Rogers said USDA has authority under the 1913 Virus-Serum-Toxin Act to prevent sale of mad-cow test kits to meatpackers. USDA interprets the law to control products for &#8220;prevention, diagnosis, management or care of diseases of animals.&#8221;</p>
<p>David Sentelle, chief judge of the District of Columbia appeals circuit, dissented from the decision. He said USDA &#8220;exceeds the bounds of reasonableness&#8221; for a law enacted to prevent the sale of ineffective animal medicine.</p></blockquote>
<p>Because, you know, if any ol&#8217; meatpacker had the capability to test for mad cow, it might, um. Mess things up. They might &#8212; horrors! &#8212; use the results to &#8220;market&#8221; their product as mad cow-tested. </p>
<blockquote><p>USDA . . . says the tests should not be used as a marketing tool and the cattle that comprise the bulk of the meat supply are too young to be tested reliably.</p></blockquote>
<p>And we can&#8217;t have that. The USDA has to be in CONTROL.</p>
<blockquote><p>USDA allows the mad-cow test kits to be sold only to laboratories that it approves.  </p></blockquote>
<p>This is where our tax dollars go. This is how a federal agency <a href="http://http://www.nal.usda.gov/speccoll/exhibits/lincoln/index.html">established to serve this country&#8217;s interest</a> is spending our freaking money. To protect ITSELF and its hold on power and the status quo IT has established.</p>
<p>Rather like the Food and Drug Administration, which thinks <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/money/20080822/1b_spinach22.art.htm">we should be irrradiating spinach to kill E. coli</a>. Who cares that we&#8217;re adding one more item to our lengthening list of biologically altered foodstuffs, as meanwhile we&#8217;re already dropping dead from the crap we eat? Who cares if irradiation destroys <a href="http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2008/08/scheme_to_irrad.html">folate and Vitamin A and who knows what other phytonutrients</a> and might have other, poorly-understood effects on our food?</p>
<p>(Hey, here&#8217;s an idea &#8212; lets turn over healthcare to a government agency too! It&#8217;s worked so well in so many other areas.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/they-say-no-to-testing-meat-for-mad-cow.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

