<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigmund&#8217;s long goodbye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kirstenmortensen.com/sigmunds-long-goodbye.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/sigmunds-long-goodbye.htm</link>
	<description>smart &#38; funny romantic comedies!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/sigmunds-long-goodbye.htm/comment-page-1#comment-3348</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=645#comment-3348</guid>
		<description>I agree that we should be past Freud.  I think Freudian theory should be studied historically, because of its impact and influence, but not as a current psychological theory.  

Btw, I once mentioned the oedipal complex and penis envy to someone (a school principal) who had never taken a psych course and had never heard of them, and he though it was sick and bizarre.  Whereas I sat there as an undergraduate, probably nodding my head and taking notes when I heard about them!  LOL!

I also very much agree with you that we can have both science and religion.  I hate hearing about the Bushies ignoring good science, and I hate hearing about scientists saying that there is nothing true that can&#039;t be measured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that we should be past Freud.  I think Freudian theory should be studied historically, because of its impact and influence, but not as a current psychological theory.  </p>
<p>Btw, I once mentioned the oedipal complex and penis envy to someone (a school principal) who had never taken a psych course and had never heard of them, and he though it was sick and bizarre.  Whereas I sat there as an undergraduate, probably nodding my head and taking notes when I heard about them!  LOL!</p>
<p>I also very much agree with you that we can have both science and religion.  I hate hearing about the Bushies ignoring good science, and I hate hearing about scientists saying that there is nothing true that can&#8217;t be measured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirsten</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/sigmunds-long-goodbye.htm/comment-page-1#comment-3149</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 01:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=645#comment-3149</guid>
		<description>Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/sigmunds-long-goodbye.htm/comment-page-1#comment-3139</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 15:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=645#comment-3139</guid>
		<description>Must admit it has been years (decades, actually) since I was a student of psychology (had a social psychology major for two or three semesters... this was when JFK was in the White House), but with that caveat let me say that I think you are exactly on target with your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must admit it has been years (decades, actually) since I was a student of psychology (had a social psychology major for two or three semesters&#8230; this was when JFK was in the White House), but with that caveat let me say that I think you are exactly on target with your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

