<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From ape to . . . theologist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kirstenmortensen.com/from-ape-to-theologist.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/from-ape-to-theologist.htm</link>
	<description>smart &#38; funny romantic comedies!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KirstenMortensen.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Secular sermons&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/from-ape-to-theologist.htm/comment-page-1#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>KirstenMortensen.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Secular sermons&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 02:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=300#comment-371</guid>
		<description>[...] In the New Statesman, John Gray critiques both Wolpert (Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast&#8211;I blogged about that book yesterday) and Daniel C Dennett, Breaking the Spell: religion as a natural phenomenon. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the New Statesman, John Gray critiques both Wolpert (Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast&#8211;I blogged about that book yesterday) and Daniel C Dennett, Breaking the Spell: religion as a natural phenomenon. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University of No Where</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/from-ape-to-theologist.htm/comment-page-1#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>University of No Where</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=300#comment-370</guid>
		<description>I think they just made a hasty inference there: having an evolutionary advantage does not necessarily mean that God wired us that way, or that believing in God is beneficial. For instance, we may just have evolved into believing in God from believing in rocks, and that&#039;s still an advantage, because it is possible that believing rocks makes us happy as believing in God does. 

That said, evolution, I think, does not imply anything religious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they just made a hasty inference there: having an evolutionary advantage does not necessarily mean that God wired us that way, or that believing in God is beneficial. For instance, we may just have evolved into believing in God from believing in rocks, and that&#8217;s still an advantage, because it is possible that believing rocks makes us happy as believing in God does. </p>
<p>That said, evolution, I think, does not imply anything religious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

