<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Easy to ridicule . . . yeah. I know.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kirstenmortensen.com/easy-to-ridicule-yeah-i-know.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/easy-to-ridicule-yeah-i-know.htm</link>
	<description>smart &#38; funny romantic comedies!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/easy-to-ridicule-yeah-i-know.htm/comment-page-1#comment-255334</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 22:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=1082#comment-255334</guid>
		<description>Oh, and very nice back-lit photo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and very nice back-lit photo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/easy-to-ridicule-yeah-i-know.htm/comment-page-1#comment-255333</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 22:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=1082#comment-255333</guid>
		<description>K,

I started to leave a smart-ass comment aasking what you&#039;ve been inhaling lately, when I re-read your title.

(Ahem . . . re-thinking comment...)

Actually, this statement of yours, &quot;Quantum physics attempts to peer into a dimension where space and time don’t exist in the way our senses would conscribe them . . .&quot; is quite true.  And given that, then . . .  Okay!

I, for one, refuse to believe a LOT of what the &quot;world&quot; seems to accept quite readily.  As in (pick your favorite disaster scenario:  Global Warming, Swine Flu Pandemic, Ozone layer holes, shortages in your favorite commodity or element, and many more in my lifetime).  

&quot; . . . a quote from one Nan Akasha who says she chooses not to believe in the recession.&quot;  So why NOT refuse to believe in &quot;the recession?&quot;  Does that truly mean that, &quot;the implication being that one can make unpleasantness go away by squeezing one’s eyes shut or something?&quot;  Or rather, that the recession is only true to the extent that OTHERS believe it is?

Kinda depends on what you mean by &quot;believe in.&quot;  How much of ANY recession is merely a product of loss of confidence?  And likewise, how much is the alleged &quot;recovery&quot; merely a product of restored confidence; a tenuous thing at best?

Yeah, I know.  A circular argument.  Shall we get into metaphysics?  What IS &quot;reality,&quot; anyway?

But, this is a hell of a well-written post.  I DO believe in that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K,</p>
<p>I started to leave a smart-ass comment aasking what you&#8217;ve been inhaling lately, when I re-read your title.</p>
<p>(Ahem . . . re-thinking comment&#8230;)</p>
<p>Actually, this statement of yours, &#8220;Quantum physics attempts to peer into a dimension where space and time don’t exist in the way our senses would conscribe them . . .&#8221; is quite true.  And given that, then . . .  Okay!</p>
<p>I, for one, refuse to believe a LOT of what the &#8220;world&#8221; seems to accept quite readily.  As in (pick your favorite disaster scenario:  Global Warming, Swine Flu Pandemic, Ozone layer holes, shortages in your favorite commodity or element, and many more in my lifetime).  </p>
<p>&#8221; . . . a quote from one Nan Akasha who says she chooses not to believe in the recession.&#8221;  So why NOT refuse to believe in &#8220;the recession?&#8221;  Does that truly mean that, &#8220;the implication being that one can make unpleasantness go away by squeezing one’s eyes shut or something?&#8221;  Or rather, that the recession is only true to the extent that OTHERS believe it is?</p>
<p>Kinda depends on what you mean by &#8220;believe in.&#8221;  How much of ANY recession is merely a product of loss of confidence?  And likewise, how much is the alleged &#8220;recovery&#8221; merely a product of restored confidence; a tenuous thing at best?</p>
<p>Yeah, I know.  A circular argument.  Shall we get into metaphysics?  What IS &#8220;reality,&#8221; anyway?</p>
<p>But, this is a hell of a well-written post.  I DO believe in that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

