To blog or not to blog . . .

If you’re a writer-o’-books, the answer to this question is “depends on who you ask.”

Miss Snark has recommended that novelists be cautious about blogging — because when you’re blogging, you’re not working on your novel. But she also wrote, once, that a “well-clicked” blog can be a plus when you’re querying agents.

Late last month, John at Romantic Ramblings recounted the advice he got from his last agent, who told him a blog was practically indispensable.

But John also found a warning on Agent Query that a blog may be a liability rather than an asset for writers looking for representation. (What they are really trying to say, I think, is that a poorly written or presented blog can be a liability. Which is true, I’m sure.)

So now, to add another twist to the conversation, comes this: Joe Garofoli, in the San Francisco Chronicle, reports on how political blogger Glenn Greenwald was able to coordinate online publicity for his non-fic book among his like-minded blogging buddies. The resulting burst of orders pushed his book to number 1 on Amazon.

Granted, Amazon is only one reseller, so if your book is ranked high there, but isn’t selling anywhere else, it doesn’t really mean much.

Except that you get to say your book is a number 1 Amazon best-seller. Certainly better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick.

So what’s the verdict? I’d say it’s something like this. Don’t blog if you tend to use it as an excuse to avoid doing the real work of writing. Don’t put up a sloppy blog, or a cheesy blog. Don’t present a virtual persona that comes across as loony or raises red flags about your people skills. (Of course, if you have people-skills problems you probably don’t know your blog comes across that way but that’s a whole ‘nother topic.)

And last but not least, remember that blogging is really a type of networking. If it’s going to help you sell books, it’s because of the relationships you’ve built, not because you’ve mentioned your title and now it shows up on Google.

Syndication for blog posts

Some weeks ago, I was invited to submit blog posts to Linkadelic magazine, a website that is part of a venture called CoMagz.

CoMagz is a tool that lets online communities compile content (whoa, accidental alliteration!) (whoa whoa, happened again!)

. . . collaboratively. (Sorry, but I really did need that word there. No helping it. But I’m done now.)

Members submit articles or links. Other members vote on them, and the articles that get the most votes get pushed to the front page.

It will be interesting to see how this works out. It’s a fairly new venture, and I assume the payback, for the CoMagz backers, is ad revenues, which means it has to attract a goodly amount of traffic.

Coincidentally, I happened across this piece in Slate by Paul Boutin, “A Grand Unified Theory of YouTube and MySpace.” Boutin notes that Youtube traffic is on par with that of cnn.com (!) and then discusses how they’ve managed that:

There are two design requirements for technology meant for the masses. First, you need to automate all the techie parts so people can just press Play. To watch television online, I shouldn’t have to install extra video software, figure out my bandwidth setting (100K? 300K?), and sign up for an account with the player’s maker. Second, Web moguls shouldn’t presume to foresee what 100 million people will want to do with their site. I’m one of many who stopped using Google’s Orkut social network because its hardwired page designs made everyone look like they were there to find a date and/or a job.

You give people a virtual communal space that’s easy to manipulate and completely flexible. CoMagz isn’t like that, it’s more structured. OTOH, it’s a nice way to push your blog posts out for more exposure.

So we’ll see. But in any case, it’s fun to be part of the experiment :)

Tell “goto” where to go. To.

I received an email today, at my blogsite addy, from The Editor. It struck a kind of familiar tone, which is strange because I don’t recall having been introduced to The Editor before.

And now he/she has popped up with a polite note reminding me to re-list my website in his/her directory . . .

Hmmmm.

So I did a little googling and look what I found:

For three years now, there has been a “website directory” scam running, where webmasters are sent bogus “renewal” notices via email, encouraging them to sign up for a web directory service, various hosted at www-goto.com or dirs.org . . .

As we have already demonstrated in the past, this is part of a exercise that is designed to collect fees from webmasters from a service they did not ask for.

Perhaps you’ve heard the expression “don’t feed the trolls.” Here’s another nice motto for a gorgeous First of May: don’t feed the snakes, either.

I have a head cold

It’s the first one I’ve had this season, which is quite an accomplishment considering that I live with a seven-year-old who counts among her primary functions congregating with 20-odd other seven-year-olds and mopping up a wide variety of microbes to carry back home.

There, how’s that for a sentence. Penetrating through my brain fog.

Anyway. I don’t really feel like blogging much, and haven’t since this came on. Give me a day or two, though, and I’ll be back ;-)

Back online; withdrawal symptoms abating

I made the stupid mistake last night of trying to fix something that wasn’t broken, with oh-so-predictable results: my blog was reduced to near shambles. Thanks to the patience of the support people at my hosting company, hostgator.com, I seem to be back up. Here’s hoping it sticks.

Back later.

Ode to the Comment Spammer

How wearisome your shallow ploys,
Your flattery, your noise
You think to pass for comment.

Have you no job? No self-respect?
Do you spend your time with eyes half-closed
And cut and paste
And think your time be well-spent?

What am I to you?
Digested food you slither through,
I see you, pale worm, eyes half closed
(If eyes you have) in the lightless tract

And hell-bent

To make your daily pennies back.

Well you’re the fool.
There’s no one here.
No one to click your trickster links.
No one to make you clever as you think
you are.

No one to render time you waste to
Time well-spent.

To plog or not to plog

Found out about this site today, via Miss Snark. It’s called BiblioBuffet and as soon as I’ve finished this post, it’s going on my blogroll under daily reads.

The article that caught my attention is about plogs–a word Amazon has trademarked and seems to suggest is a contraction of “personal blog.” (Since “blog” itself is short for weblog, I personally wish they’d chosen “pwog.” It’s much more fun to say, and suggests pucker-lipped little baby amphibians, which is always a plus.) The BiblioBuffet article, otoh, refers to “plog” as a hybrid of plug and blog. It will be interesting to see if the grassroots meme overpowers Amazon’s corporate narrative.

Check the article to see what people–mainly readers–have to say about plogs. It’s not all of it good.

UPDATE: Victoria Strauss of Writer Beware is blogging about plogging.