<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on bogus Amazon reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kirstenmortensen.com/410.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/410.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KirstenMortensen.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Amazon&#8217;s policy on sock puppetry</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/410.htm/comment-page-1#comment-7949</link>
		<dc:creator>KirstenMortensen.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Amazon&#8217;s policy on sock puppetry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=410#comment-7949</guid>
		<description>[...] It isn&#8217;t easy to find, but if you check out the Participation Guidelines that Amazon publishes on the Community section of the site, there&#8217;s a clause that suggests sock puppetry is a no-no. It&#8217;s under Prohibited Content or Activities, which lists the &#8220;conduct or Content that is prohibited&#8221; and includes this bullet:  The impersonation of any person or entity or forging of any e-mail communication or any part of a message [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It isn&#8217;t easy to find, but if you check out the Participation Guidelines that Amazon publishes on the Community section of the site, there&#8217;s a clause that suggests sock puppetry is a no-no. It&#8217;s under Prohibited Content or Activities, which lists the &#8220;conduct or Content that is prohibited&#8221; and includes this bullet:  The impersonation of any person or entity or forging of any e-mail communication or any part of a message [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KirstenMortensen.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What would you do?</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/410.htm/comment-page-1#comment-7689</link>
		<dc:creator>KirstenMortensen.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What would you do?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=410#comment-7689</guid>
		<description>[...] Several months ago I put up a post about a fellow named Rhett Ellis who has used psuedonymous Amazon reviews to try to pump his self-pubbed novels. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Several months ago I put up a post about a fellow named Rhett Ellis who has used psuedonymous Amazon reviews to try to pump his self-pubbed novels. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vancouver girl</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/410.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>Vancouver girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=410#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>I know Rhett or knew him personally. I know his writing style, and I can say for certain that most of those amazon reviews are his own words. His dream is to be a published writer, but it looks like he&#039;s shot that dream to heck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Rhett or knew him personally. I know his writing style, and I can say for certain that most of those amazon reviews are his own words. His dream is to be a published writer, but it looks like he&#8217;s shot that dream to heck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirsten</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/410.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 12:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=410#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>Wow, Charles, phone messages????

Do you really think he brings in that much? $30-40K?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Charles, phone messages????</p>
<p>Do you really think he brings in that much? $30-40K?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles E Dawson</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/410.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1410</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles E Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 03:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=410#comment-1410</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I too have had direct experience with Rhett Ellis. After writing a very negative review of his &#039;How I Fell in Love with a Librarian&#039; , I got a spate of phone messages from Ellis. When I finally spoke with him, he actually tried to brow beat me into withdrawing the review (something he subsequently managed to do with Amazon - the review has been deleted).
Aspects of this &#039;manipulation game&#039; arose in that conversation too. 

What you have to realize is all this is gravy for Mr. Ellis. He has about 6 books out there (in itself a self-serving little cycle). In our conversation, he claimed he was a minister by profession, so any book income is just a tidy little supplement. I can think of a lot of things I could do with an extra $30 or $40 K.

It&#039;s unfortunate, because it makes one leery of Amazon review, and yet I have found reviews that have lead me to good reads I would have otherwise missed. Currently, the clueless folks at Amazon have combined Ellis&#039; Librarian book with Larry Bienhart&#039;s &#039;the Librarian&#039;. I can only hope that some of the folks who buy Ellis&#039; pathetic little book are lucky enough to discover Larry Bienhart&#039;s body of work !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I too have had direct experience with Rhett Ellis. After writing a very negative review of his &#8216;How I Fell in Love with a Librarian&#8217; , I got a spate of phone messages from Ellis. When I finally spoke with him, he actually tried to brow beat me into withdrawing the review (something he subsequently managed to do with Amazon &#8211; the review has been deleted).<br />
Aspects of this &#8216;manipulation game&#8217; arose in that conversation too. </p>
<p>What you have to realize is all this is gravy for Mr. Ellis. He has about 6 books out there (in itself a self-serving little cycle). In our conversation, he claimed he was a minister by profession, so any book income is just a tidy little supplement. I can think of a lot of things I could do with an extra $30 or $40 K.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s unfortunate, because it makes one leery of Amazon review, and yet I have found reviews that have lead me to good reads I would have otherwise missed. Currently, the clueless folks at Amazon have combined Ellis&#8217; Librarian book with Larry Bienhart&#8217;s &#8216;the Librarian&#8217;. I can only hope that some of the folks who buy Ellis&#8217; pathetic little book are lucky enough to discover Larry Bienhart&#8217;s body of work !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirsten</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/410.htm/comment-page-1#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 15:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=410#comment-558</guid>
		<description>Hi, John. 

Nothing like a fresh bit of Internet slang, eh?

Re: Ellis -- it&#039;s funny, but he&#039;s not really a novelist. He&#039;s a guy who has set up a business that exploits a weakness in the screening of Amazon&#039;s &quot;online community.&quot; 

It will be interesting to see what will happen if this gets some visibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, John. </p>
<p>Nothing like a fresh bit of Internet slang, eh?</p>
<p>Re: Ellis &#8212; it&#8217;s funny, but he&#8217;s not really a novelist. He&#8217;s a guy who has set up a business that exploits a weakness in the screening of Amazon&#8217;s &#8220;online community.&#8221; </p>
<p>It will be interesting to see what will happen if this gets some visibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duke of Earle</title>
		<link>http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/410.htm/comment-page-1#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>Duke of Earle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 14:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstenmortensen.com/index.php/?p=410#comment-557</guid>
		<description>Good post.  I learned from it what a &quot;sock puppet&quot; is (other than the kind I played with as a kid.)

I had a similar experience (and blogged about it) with an online camera retailer in New Jersey.  I&#039;ve since learned that several of these folks are notorious for writing their own &quot;buyers&#039; reviews&quot; to convince people like me that they&#039;re legit.  The telltale was that about two-thirds of the reviews said they were the best retailer the reviewer had ever dealt with, but the other one-third said they were crooks.  Nothing in between.  Hmmmm.

Back to your post.  I agree.  Mr Ellis is enjoying short term very limited benefit, but at the cost of his integrity and reputation.  Not a good exchange, IMO.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.  I learned from it what a &#8220;sock puppet&#8221; is (other than the kind I played with as a kid.)</p>
<p>I had a similar experience (and blogged about it) with an online camera retailer in New Jersey.  I&#8217;ve since learned that several of these folks are notorious for writing their own &#8220;buyers&#8217; reviews&#8221; to convince people like me that they&#8217;re legit.  The telltale was that about two-thirds of the reviews said they were the best retailer the reviewer had ever dealt with, but the other one-third said they were crooks.  Nothing in between.  Hmmmm.</p>
<p>Back to your post.  I agree.  Mr Ellis is enjoying short term very limited benefit, but at the cost of his integrity and reputation.  Not a good exchange, IMO.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
